The Inadequacy of Transcendental Proofs
Some arguments try to prove God exists by showing that things like logic, morality, or knowledge would be impossible without Him. These are called transcendental proofs. While they point us toward God, they cannot fully reveal who He is. Only God’s special revelation in the Bible does that.
1. Seeing a Shadow
“You can see that something exists, but not what it really is.”
- What it shows: Transcendental proofs give a “shadow” of God’s existence.
- What it doesn’t show: God’s true character, will, or plan.
- Illustration: Seeing a shadow on a wall tells you an object is there, but not what it really is. Scripture removes the shadow and reveals God clearly.
2. Reading a Map Without the Legend
“The map may guide you, but you won’t understand the symbols.”
- What it shows: Philosophy can point toward God.
- What it doesn’t show: How God relates to us and what He desires.
- Illustration: A map without a legend lets you see paths, but you can’t understand the symbols. Scripture acts as the legend, showing God’s nature and how to live in response to Him.
3. A Key That Fits the Lock
“The lock exists, but only one key can open it.”
- What it shows: The universe’s order and morality demand a Creator.
- What it doesn’t show: How to access or understand God fully.
- Illustration: A lock represents the order of the universe. Transcendental proofs point to the lock, but only the Bible provides the key that fits perfectly.
Why This Matters
No matter how sophisticated philosophical arguments are, they cannot replace God’s Word. Any theology or philosophy that does not start with the triune God revealed in Scripture is incomplete. It may point toward God, but it cannot be truly Christian or fully verified.
Stand Firm! 